Every review starts with the powers a system holds: to propose, decide, spend, execute, appoint and remove, change the rules, veto, settle disputes, act in an emergency, admit and expel, and leave. For each one Solon asks who holds it, how it is exercised, who it affects, how its use is judged, and who answers for it.
Good governance is the best fit between people and powers: each power held by those with the knowledge, incentives and standing to use it well, run through a process that suits it, judged by those it affects, and connected to learning. Then Solon tests every power against the realistic adversaries: borrowed votes, a large holder or delegate cartel, low turnout, a compromised key, an emergency, and a change to the rules themselves.
It is concrete: thresholds, durations and clause text, not adjectives. Every recommendation names its trade-off, and when Solon has a view it shows the strongest case against it.